DIXIE HERITAGE - Receive your FREE eBook!
  • DIXIE HERITAGE
  • SIGN-UP
  • Store
  • Newsletter
  • Radio
  • LINKS
  • SupportDH

MOORE WANTS MUSLIMS NOT CONFEDERATES

6/24/2016

 
Picture
​Floridians often joke about Publix being our one shared pride as a State. Whether Republican or Democrat; North Floridians or South; white, black, Latino, or otherwise, it seems the one thing that the vast majority of residents can completely agree upon is that we love a good Publix supermarket. Shopping there is, as we all know, an absolute pleasure. 
 
We know this, and yet we didn't expect that a special panel assembled by the state government would recommend replacing a statue of a Confederate General with one of Publix and its founder George Jenkins.  
 
That's right, Florida could send a statue of Jenkins to sit in the Capital Building in Washington, D.C. 
 
The National Statuary Hall houses two statues from each state, honoring their most historic and important citizens in the halls of the U.S. Capitol building. One of Florida's current statues is of the Confederate Army's Gen. Edmund Kirby Smith. 
 
This week an ad hoc committee of the state's Great Floridians Program met to select the three finalists who should replace him.
 
Here are your contestants: 
  • *      environmentalist Marjory Stoneman Douglas
  • *      Civil Rights icon Mary McLeod Bethune
  • *      George Jenkins, the Publix guy. 
 
The panel selected the finalists from 259 names submitted by Floridians. That said, 153 of the 259 votes were for Tim Tebow. Also beating the three "finalists" in the vote count were two of the States more famous icons: Flipper the dolphin and Mickey Mouse.
 
The voters of Florida be damned, Douglas and Bethune have dominated the conversation since the beginning of the movement to replace Smith. Their finalist status is no surprise. Jenkins is really the only shocker on the shortlist. 
 
By the way, the other Florida person honored in the Statuary Hall is John Gorrie, a doctor who invented an early form of air conditioning. So, yes, there's a chance Florida could end up paying homage to A/C and everyone's favorite supermarket deli in the U.S. Capitol. Talk about Publix and chill. 
 
The state Legislature will have the final say, and the vote will, in all likelihood, come down to Douglas and Bethune. Either would become just the tenth woman honored in the hall.
 
Marco Rubio, a University of Florida alumni who by the way led the Tebow statuary campaign, will Run for Senate. Maybe that will go better than his failed presidential and Tebow for statuary campaigns. 



CONGRESS REMOVES CONFEDERATE FLAG BAN
 
A measure to bar confederate flags from cemeteries run by the Department of Veterans Affairs was removed from legislation passed by the House early Thursday.
 
The flag ban was added to the VA funding bill in May by a vote of 265-159, with most Republicans voting against the ban. But Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) both supported the measure. Ryan was commended for allowing a vote on the controversial measure, but has since limited what amendments can be offered on the floor.
 
In negotiations to reconcile the House funding measure with the Senate bill, the confederate flag provision was dropped. The bill passed the House 239-171.
 
Of the eight House Republicans Ryan appointed to the conference committee that ultimately stripped the measure, four had voted against the ban on the floor.
 
A GOP aide declined to comment on the internal deliberations that led to the removal of the ban.


Senator Criticized For Attacking "Confederate Flag Funeral"
 
South Carolina Senator Margie Bright Matthews is facing criticism for slamming a Colleton county funeral procession that prominently displayed several Confederate flags.
 
"Shame, shame, shame!!" Matthews wrote in a since-deleted Facebook post containing video of the procession - which passed by her home.
 
The funeral procession was for 28-year-old Marshall Catterton, who died last weekend when a car struck him as he attempted to move a dead deer from a local roadway.
 
"Be a good citizen, get killed - then get mocked by your own Senator," said James Bessenger.
 
Matthews claimed her post was justified - "Given all of the horrible events that have happened recently and their connection (or not) to this flag, it evokes ... distress in others," she wrote on social media.  "My grandson was in the house and was upset that someone was going to hurt him."
 
Bessenger said Matthews was making excuses for her action and that she was looking for a reason to attack the flag. "She was just chomping at the bit to be able to say something about a Confederate flag," Bessenger said.  "She saw an opportunity to look like a righteous social warrior and ended up putting her ugly liberal foot in her mouth.  How can someone claim to represent her district when she mocks the deaths of her own constituents?"
 
Hard to argue that point ...
 
Bessenger has launched an online petition demanding Matthews' resignation.  The petition calls out Matthews for her "poor understanding of history" and for harboring a "desire to stir racial division" in South Carolina.


Caledonia County Fair (VERMONT) Prohibits Sale of Confederate Flags
 
Are they "Feelin' the Burn?"


STATUE MOVEMENT IS FINALIZED

Jefferson Circuit Judge Judith McDonald-Burkman's written ruling on June 20th affirmed a May 25 verbal decision to deny an injunction sought by plaintiffs, including the Sons of Confederate Veterans, who had earlier won a temporary restraining order halting removal work. It also granted Fischer's motion to dismiss the case - allowing the city, which had pledged to do no removal work until the ruling, to press ahead.
 
He said the public art commission will hold a meeting within a month to consider possible relocation sites, and no removal work will occur until a site is determined. Some sites suggested by the public in recent weeks have included Perryville Battlefield State Park and the Pewee Valley Confederate Cemetery.
 
Jefferson County Attorney Mike O'Connell called the plaintiffs' case "a sham" that was totally devoid of any real evidence.
 
Fred Wilhite, an officer of the Kentucky Division Sons of Confederate Veterans who was a plaintiff, said he didn't know whether the ruling would be appealed.
 
Recently, attorneys for the plaintiffs sought to be relieved from representing them claiming that their client was "racist." 
Picture
​What The Confederate Stranger and A Small Town in Maine Can Teach Us
 
In 1862, a man named Lt. Charles H. Colley of Gray, ME was killed during the Battle of Cedar Mountain. When his grieving family opened up the casket that was supposed to contain their son, they were stunned to discover that a fully uniformed Confederate soldier had been shipped to them instead. Having no way to identify the soldier, and also lacking the means to ship him back to Virginia, Lt. Colley's family decided to bury him in Gray Village Cemetery alongside the Union soldiers who had been killed in the war. They figured that this unknown Confederate's family would appreciate the gesture, even though they'd never find out about it. 

The Ladies of Gray, a group of mothers whose sons were either missing, injured, or killed in the war, paid to put up a headstone for this unknown Confederate.
The headstone's inscription is simple and gut-wrenching: "Stranger. A soldier of the late war. Erected by the Ladies of Gray."
Picture
For the first 90-something years after Stranger's most unexpected arrival in Maine, his headstone was treated the same as all of the other veterans buried at the cemetery. Since 1956, however, a Confederate battle flag has been placed next to Stranger's gravesite each Memorial Day--a pop of solid red amidst a sea of American flags.

Gray sent more people to fight for the Union Army per capita than any small town in Maine, and nearly 200 of them didn't get to come home. The people of Gray, especially mothers whose sons could have been shot at or killed by Stranger, had every right to have simply buried Stranger in an unmarked grave in a field somewhere in the town. It would have been completely understandable -- this person was, after all, an enemy soldier during a time of war. Instead, they recognized their shared humanity with this unknown man, and buried him alongside local heroes and treated him like one of their own.

Which brings me to today.

We've come a long way from 1862, but not entirely in a good way. Our nation, and in particular its liberals should look to the actions of the Ladies of Gray for inspiration on how to behave with decency and respect in times of fighting and conflict. 

In 1862, America had divided into two nations at war -- it doesn't get more polarized than that. If the Ladies of Gray could find it within themselves to create and maintain a dignified memorial to a man who was quite literally shooting at their sons before he died, there's no excuse for the attacks against Southern memorials 150 years later.



Last Confederate General Surrenders

On yesterday, in 1865, more than two months after Lee's surrender, Cherokee Stand Watie became the last Confederate General to surrender his forces in the final days of the WBTS. 

Born in Georgia, Watie had sided with the Cherokee faction supporting removal to the West and signed the Treaty of New Echota. 

At the time of the outbreak of the War, Watie was a planter in the Indian Territory. He sided with the Confederacy and was commissioned as a Colonel and was later promoted to General. Watie spent much of the war waging guerrilla warfare in the Indian Territory and adjacent states.

General Watie is one of my personal favorite Generals to study. Everyone who gives a gift of $5 or more to Dixie Heritage this week will receive a great book, a Biography of General Stand Watie. 
​
Order Biography of Cherokee Stand Watie - Last Confederate General:
Donate $5
Picture
As we stated in last week's Letter, our response to the Condemnation of the Confederate Battle Flag by the Southern Baptist Convention "will be ongoing."
 
That attack has been led by liberal / modernist Dr. Russell Moore, President of the SBC's Ethics And Religious Liberty Commission.
 
Moore has essentially been fighting a TWO-front war because at the same time he has been violently attacking the founders of his denomination and our heritage, he has also been actively working to unite the Southern Baptist Convention with Islam.
 
I believe that the real reason why Moore pushed the flag resolution at the recent annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention was because he knew that its debate would eat up all of the time that could have been better used examining the documents which Moore has been signing on behalf of Southern Baptists that will yoke their denomination with Islam.
 
Still, Moore could not dodge the issue entirely. He was asked a direct question from a messenger at the annual meeting about his intentional support of Islam. This pastor posed to Moore the same question that Joshua posed to the religious of his day in Joshua 24:15, "And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."
 
Here is the question posed to Dr. Moore regarding his alliance of Southern Baptists with Islam:
 
"I would like to know how in the world someone in the Southern Baptist Convention can support the defending of rights for Muslims to construct mosques in the united states when these people threaten our very way of existence as Christians and Americans.  They are murdering Christians, beheading Christians, imprisoning Christians all over the world.  Do you actually believe that if Jesus Christ were here today, He would actually support this and that He would stand up and say, well, let us support the rights of those Baal worshippers to erect temples to Baal?  Do you believe that Dr. Moore?"
 
The query, offered by a Southern Baptist pastor, is straightforward and Biblically-informed received a smug and condescending reply from Moore:
 
"You know sometimes we have to deal with questions that are really complicated and we have to spend a lot of time thinking them through and not sure what the final result was going to be.  Sometimes we have really hard decisions to make.  This isn't one of those things."
 
Joshua, who led God's chosen to settle the promised land, destroyed pagan nations worshipping their foreign gods and idols as God promised Israel He would do.  He forbade His chosen people to engage in alliances with those pagan nations.  He also commanded the wholesale destruction of not only the idolatrous temples and altars of those foreign gods but also the destruction of those who worshipped them.
 
It's important to remember a fundamental attribute of God that Baptists believe - His immutability.  God does not change.  What He hated in the days of Joshua, He yet hates today.  His expectations of faithful obedience by His chosen people - of whom Southern Baptists purport to be among - has not changed.  The New Testament affirms the command for the church to be separate from the pagan world around us, not to, as Moore entreats, to create alliances with it (2 Corinthians 6:17).
 
Intending to belittle the Southern Baptist pastor who dared question him, Moore, the elitist, made it very clear that it was not a difficult decision for him to align the SBC with Baal.  It took no thought.  It wasn't given any consideration as to worthiness.  It was a no-brainer, guided as it was by the tenets of "American" Christianity, rather than rightly being directed by actual Bible Christianity.
 
Moore then provides this definition of "Baptist" for the rebuked, insolent questioner:
 
"What it means to be a Baptist is to support soul freedom for everybody."
 
At this point, supportive applause for Moore ensued around the meeting hall indicating the pervasiveness that this culturally-worshipped idol of tolerance represents among too many in the SBC who sadly would rather be seen as co-conspirators in a treaty of co-existence as Americans rather than as a Bible-believing denomination standing, alone if necessary, on the promises, and commands, of God's Word.
 
The Baptists of old very loudly proclaimed the doctrine of Soul Liberty without promoting, assisting, or otherwise yoking up with Muslims. Moore, in typical modernist fashion, lacks their understanding of the defining doctrine.
 
Russell Moore is attempting to cloth everything in the garments of religious liberty. Disagree with Moore's alliances with Muslims and you oppose religious liberty. Disagree with Moore's abuse of SBC resources to promote the flooding of our nation with hundreds of thousands of new refugees from Muslim nations and you are opposing religious liberty.
 
No one is against religious liberty in America. (Perhaps especially not the Muslims!) We are thankful for it. We benefit from it. We ought to stand boldly for it. But it is not necessary, nor Biblically-tolerable, for Southern Baptists to intentionally join hands with pagans as they pursue their own rights under it. It is that alliance that is unnecessary and, as is being seen around the world in God's saving grace, it is not a necessity for our - or His - faithfulness.
 
As Baptists, we'd do well to err on the side of Scripture.  He's called us to obedience, not to unfettered and Scripture-free tolerance, and He has certainly not called us to enter into unholy alliances.
 
Russell Moore would do well to remember the preaching of one who led many of our Founding Fathers to faith, 18th-century evangelist George Whitefield:
 
"The sins of the church are far more offensive to God than the sins of the nation."
 
And fellow Baptists, we are in sinful, willful, disobedience to our God, led as we are by the likes of Russell Moore and every applauding hand-clapper who fails to acknowledge, by active obedience, the sovereignty of the Lord our God and His command for us to not be unequally yoked with unbelievers.

Our regular contributor, Al Benson, contributes the following:

Let me start off by saying that I have several friends who are Southern Baptists and I know some Southern Baptist preachers who are good, patriotic pastors for their congregations. My comments here are not directed at them or their congregations. I realize they see some of the same problems I am addressing here as much as I do.

Last week and earlier this week (this was originally written on Sat. June 18th) I did two articles on my other blog spot http://thecopperhead.blogspot.com  about the Southern Baptist resolution to disavow and remove all Confederate battle flags. The Southern Baptists have  been holding their yearly meeting this past week and the anti-Confederate flag resolution was of many that passed by a healthy margin so I am told. The people in the Southern Baptist Convention that pushed this resolution feel that all Christians should show "solidarity" (a good Marxist term) by removing any Confederate flags they have up anywhere. I hope they don't hold their breath!

This resolution denies the legitimacy of the Cause that all Confederate soldiers fought for (which was not "racism" or slavery) and it verbally slaps in the face today anyone who has a Confederate ancestor that resisted Yankee/Marxist aggression, and that includes me. Whatever Confederate flags  I have out  (and I vary them) are going to stay out and I seriously question the "concern" of those Southern Baptists that tell me I am "racist" for keeping them out. Oh, I don't doubt the politically correct do have a concern-but for what and who? A lot of us here in the South are really getting fed up with the "perpetually offended" who expect us to totally dismantle our Christian culture and heritage just because they claim it bothers them. If I got to the point where I started listing things in their cultures  that bother me we could really have a donnybrook.

Unfortunately, the situation with the Confederate flag seems to be a symptom of where the Southern Baptists are headed in the main. I just read an article on http://www.wnd.com the headline for which was: Pastor to Southern Baptist Convention: Stop push for Muslim refugees.  The article stated: "The Southern Baptist Convention threw down a gauntlet at the feet of Republican nominee Donald Trump and many conservatives, adopting a resolution encouraging churches and families to welcome and adopt refugees into their churches and homes...The resolution did not specifically refer to Islam or Muslims. However, Russell Moore, the head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Commission has been a prominent critic of Donald Trump and his proposed immigration policies...The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention is also supporting the building of a mosque in Bernard, New Jersey."

Needless to say, some of the local residents in that area are not overly enthused about the mosque and their concern about Shariah law in their area is a legitimate one. So why is the Southern Baptist Convention even doing this? I could see some of the culturally Marxist churches such as those in the National Council of Churches supporting this because they have been making common cause with the enemies of Christ for decades now, so it would come as no surprise to see them involved. But the Southern Baptist Convention is supposed to be a "conservative" group. Or has the definition of conservatism been changed?

One Southern Baptist pastor, Carl Gallups noted: "What should the Southern Baptist Convention have done about the mosque in New Jersey? They should have stayed out of the situation altogether!  They should have left the matter up to the voice of the local people and their elected and appointed officials..." Gallups made an accurate observation when he said: "...the ERLC would be hard pressed to find anywhere in the scriptures, or elsewhere, where the early church was aligning itself with government entities and 'interfaith coalitions' to assist in the constructing of more pagan temples, shrines and altars to Emperor worship in the Roman Empire-in the name of 'religious liberty'."

Gallups also noted that this was not the first attempt by the SBC committee at supporting the building of mosques.  The WorldNewsDaily article also observed that: "Gallups also pointed to the history of the ERLC in supporting mosque construction, notably the support of the Executive Director Richard Land for building the 'Ground Zero mosque' in 2010." Gallups said: "I find it very suspicious that the ERLC, just a few years ago, under Richard Land attempted the same 'mosque building agenda'...Now, only five years later, Dr. Russell  Moore does the very same thing." Whether he realizes it or not, Pastor Gallups is observing cultural Marxism at work and in living color. The cultural Marxists, whether in churches or out (and there are a number of them within churches) do not deviate from their agenda and their agenda is ultimately anti-Christian, so they will work to get the church, in our apostate day, to support the cutting of its own spiritual throat-all in the name of "love" naturally.
Pastor Gallups mentioned Richard Land a couple times in his comments. So who is Richard Land? Richard Land, who used to hold high positions in the Southern Baptist Convention, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, at least they have him listed as a member as of June 18th of this year.  So why does a leading Southern Baptist belong to the CFR? There would seem to be a contradiction or at least a major conflict of interest here. A prominent Southern Baptist as a member of the premier One World Government organization in this country, a member of the leading organization that promotes One World secular government! Something smells here and it ain't in Denmark.

Now I've had a few folks over the years my Dad included, who told me I had a suspicious mind, but when you start to see things like this, how can you not have a suspicious mind unless you've quit thinking altogether?

I also ran across another interesting article on http://www.texemarrs.com that was published back in 2007 that dealt with the Council on Foreign Relations and Christian pastors that seem to be part of that group. The article dealt with "global spirituality." It stated, in part, "To achieve this, the Illuminti's premier political and economic organ, the socialistic, pro-Zionist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), has elevated to membership two key operatives, two men who are at the helm of America's most influential Christian evangelical groups. I refer to Pastor Rick Warren, Saddleback Community Church in California, and Dr. Richard Land, reigning religious potantate and poobah  of the massive Southern Baptist Convention. For the first time in the almost 100-year history of the CFR, evangelical leaders have been elevated to elite status as members of the exclusive globalist secret society." I have often wondered about these evangelicals that end up with hundreds of churches following their agenda, whatever it happens to be at the time, and when I found out that Rick Warren was a big supporter of Obama in his first term, I knew I had been right to be suspicious. In regard to Dr. Richard Land, it turns out that he was (is) a big promoter of environmentalism.  It has been said that "Land essentially believes that Jesus died on the cross to save Mother Earth and to save human souls. Land says that the Great Commission includes the preaching of environmentalism just as much as it does the traditional John 3:16 message."
​
So, has the CFR suddenly become interested in the Gospel message-or is it more interested in finding usable Christian pastors to push its "gospel" message onto unsuspecting Christian believers? It might be worthwhile and good for Southern Batist believers to start doing a little homework on Dr. Land and this One World Government organization he is part of.  If you want to read about the Council on Foreign Relaltions check out Gary Allen's book None Dare Call It Conspiracy. It was published way back in 1976 but it is still relevant today. I understand that it is now out on the Internet and so you can check it out there for nothing, and you DO need to check it out.


SUPPORT DIXIE HERITAGE

Receive a banner ad in the next 52 issues of the Dixie Heritage Letter for the reduced rate of just $300 - thats just $5.76 per issue. Your banner ad will also go on the website for an entire year at no additional cost. Click the banner below to eMail for more information on how you can support Dixie Heritage and at the same time put yourself before a great audience of Southern patriots.       
Picture
​Commander in Chief of the SCV addresses the Southern Baptist Convention's purge of the Southern Cross
 
The history of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) has been inextricably tied to the Confederacy and her heirs for over a century and a half. Great pulpit expositors, as well as seminary professors that left their mark in the area of Biblical thought and world view offered service to the Confederacy, as chaplains and men of arms, as well. Therefore, it was a profound disappointment and excruciatingly disheartening to hear the anti-Confederate Battle Flag resolution that was approved by SBC messengers meeting in St. Louis on June 14.
 
The resolution offended on several levels -- first of all, simply put, it did not adequately deal with the Truth of the nature of the Flag, particularly disappointing as Christians should place a premium on the Truth. The 800,000 men that served the Confederacy held, and always will hold, full title to that banner -- it is a soldiers' flag and their political agenda was nothing more than defense of their home. Furthermore, as the Fifth Commandment compels us to "honor father and mother", those of us who enjoy Confederate ancestry are bound to tell the Truth of our ancestors fight and flag. Finally, the tone of the resolution has the effect of intimidating the consciences of Southern Baptists into holding a terribly negative opinion of Confederate symbols.
 
All that said, the SBC is not a hierarchy; local congregations are in no way bound to the resolution. They may continue on as they have done, in some cases, for many years, in helping their community to retain its history and honoring the men that rebuilt their community after a tragic war and devastating reconstruction. Today, we call upon the great SBC congregations throughout the South to do just that, ignore this distraction and get on with the priorities of Gospel proclamation, building up of the fellowship of Faith and pursuing a witness of goodwill in the community. Untold numbers of these SBC churches, over the years, have cultivated great relationships with SCV camps by opening their facilities for regular meetings and special occasions, not to mention the cemeteries owned by SBC churches where the remains of legions of Confederate heroes lie -- these are sites for numerous memorial services.
 
Of course, in addition to the historical ties of the Confederacy and SBC, thousands of SCV members are also members of SBC churches. In closing, we call on our camps to pursue "peace with all men" (Heb. 12:14) by cultivating good relationships with all organizations in their community, particularly houses of worship, be they SBC, other Christian denominations or Jewish Synagogues.
 
Deo Vindice!
Charles Kelly Barrow
Commander-in-Chief
Sons of Confederate Veterans



SBC STATISTICAL PREDICTION

Convention statisticians, who can predict coming trends with pinpoint accuracy, are anticipating that the Convention's churches will loose at least 225,000 members as a direct result of the resolution against the Confederate Battle Flag. 



One of our readers in Virginia sent the following letter to his pastor this week: 

Greetings Rev. Smith:

          We were in church when you made the announcement that the Convention had voted to pass the Anti-Confederate Flag, Anti-Christian resolution.  The devil shouted with glee that his will has been done!  It is hard for me to believe that with that many preachers present, none took a stand for the Gospel of Jesus Christ!
          You are well aware that the Confederate flag proudly displays the Cross of St. Andrew: next to the Cross of Jesus the most scared symbol in all Christianity!  The Constitution of the Confederate States of America plainly stated that God (the Christian God) was the founder of the nation.  It was no accident that the Confederate Congress adopted the Cross of St. Andrew as the symbol of the nation.

          The Southern people loved their country and their flag.  Southern Baptist boys fought hard for the Cross of St. Andrew; many willingly gave their lives under that flag!  Those who founded the Southern Baptist Church; those who preached the Gospel of Jesus Christ; those who have been members and who have advanced the church unto this day strongly stood for the Gospel.  Now, the Convention has defecated on all their graves!

          By taking an Anti-Cross of St. Andrew; Anti-Gospel stand, the Southern Baptist Convention has replaced Jesus with the devil.

          When you made the announcement that the Baptist Church was no longer a Christian organization, we walked out!

          If you would like to discuss this e-mail or anything related to the War Between the States, please contact me.

          I end most of my personal communications with "God Bless!" but I cannot with this letter.

Southernly Yours,
Gary C. Walker
Picture
Former Defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld said he's "clearly going to vote" for Donald Trump for president, calling Trump's opponent, Hillary Clinton, "unacceptable."

"The way I think of it is this," Rumsfeld said Wednesday night on Fox News Channel's On the Record with Greta Van Susteren. "On the Democrats' side, we have a known known. On the Republican side, we have a recent entry, who's a known unknown."

That line, of course, was a play on a famous series of statements uttered at a Pentagon briefing in February 2002 in response to a question about whether there was evidence Iraq had tried to supply terrorists with weapons of mass destruction.

"There are known knowns; there are things we know we know," Rumsfeld said then. "We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know."

Trump, apparently, falls into the second category, according to Rumsfeld.

Rumsfeld, who served as Defense secretary for both Presidents George W. Bush and Gerald Ford, went on to cite the reasons he found Clinton "unacceptable" for president, including her handling of the Benghazi attack in September 2012 and her use of a private email server to handle government information while serving as secretary of State.

As for Trump, Van Susteren asked Rumsfeld if he was endorsing or just supporting the presumptive GOP nominee, a distinction some Republicans have made in announcing their support of the real estate mogul.

"I don't know that there's any difference," but added: "No one asked me for my endorsement."

"I'm clearly going to vote for him," Rumsfeld said of Trump. "I just can't imagine not."
​
Trump tweeted Thursday morning that he "very much appreciated" the support of the former Defense secretary.



 
LIKE US ON fACEBOOK

Use this link to visit the fACEBOOK page:


https://www.facebook.com/dixieheritageletter



VISIT OUR NEW WEBSITE:

Dixie Heritage has a new home on the internet.


www.dixieheritage.net 
YES, we are still giving a FREE eBook (PDF) copy of the book The Truth About the Confederate Flag  to everyone who visits the website - so tell your friends - and your enemies!  
   
 www.dixieheritage.net
Until next week,
Deo Vindice!
Chaplain Ed

Repudiating Confederate Flag Ban

6/17/2016

 
The latest push against the Confederate flag is coming from the pulpit.

Last week, the National Cathedral in Washington, DC, announced that it will remove images of the flag on its stained glass windows.

This week, the Southern Baptist Convention voted that members stop displaying the Confederate flag.

Black Texas pastor Dwight McKissic proposed the Confederate flag resolution to the SBC national convention which has met this week in St. Louis. 

"The SBC supported the Confederacy and was emotionally and philosophically attached to the Confederacy," McKissic proclaimed. 

The SBC was created in 1845 in response to a number of theological disagreements with the churches of Northern states. McKissic, and certain liberal/modernist-leaning SBC leaders like Russell Moore and Albert Mohler are falsely proclaiming that the SBC was established to promote slavery throughout the South.

I did not believe that the matter would even come up for vote this week because many within the SBC leadership were skeptical about how the proposal would be received. No doubt it was only brought to the floor to distract the messengers from weightier matters that the leadership did not to publicly address. This is always the case, remember the "Disney Boycott" - typically these are "red herring" issues. 

More surprisingly, when they brought the resolution to the floor, a large block of members demonstrated their commitment to the proposal. 

Messengers proposed changes to the original proposal, and leaders, not wanting the matter to be too divisive, even suggested references to family history and maintaining the flag as a symbol of Southern pride. But in the end, the Messengers approved the resolution as originally proposed and called for outright removal rather than limited displays.

"We call our brothers and sisters in Christ to discontinue the display of the Confederate flag as a sign of solidarity of the whole Body of Christ, including our African-American brothers and sisters," said the final draft of the resolution.

Russell Moore, the leader of the SBC's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission,celebrated the passage of the resolution by saying:  "Today, messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention, including many white Anglo southerners, decided the cross was more important than the flag. They decided our African-American brothers and sisters are more important than family heritage."

Speaking to the Messengers, after the vote, Dr. Jimmy Merritt, a man who I thought to have been proud off his Confederate heritage, loudly proclaimed:

"My fellow Southern Baptists, I'm not speaking to you today just as the pastor of a church. I am the great-great-grandson of two men who fought in the confederate army. One is buried in the confederate cemetery in Litchfield, Virginia. One fought in my hometown of Atlanta, Georgia. .... All the confederate flags in the world are not worth one soul of any race." 

And while I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Merritt in the inexplicable value of a soul - after all it was for that soul that Jesus died - what I fail to understand, what I have been saying to my Southern Baptist brethren, and my direct question to Dr. Merritt (and also to Moore, Mohler, etc.) is why does it have to be an EITHER/OR? 

The same Bible that proclaims the worth of a soul, the same Bible that commands us to preach the Gospel to that soul, also commands us to honor our fathers. 
So why cannot we Southern Baptists do both? Why are some in the SBC so hell-bent that we must dishonor our fathers in order to "reach" certain souls? 

The founders of the Southern Baptist Convention were, as was pointed out at this week's convention, "emotionally and philosophically attached to the Confederacy," And they won multitudes of souls. Not just white souls, but also millions of black, asian, and latino souls too. The Southern Baptists had the greatest global missionary outreach the world had ever seen. 

Our heritage is not an evil one - but a righteous one. Our ancestors were godly men and women. 

Am I the only one noticing that those who would have us abandon our heritage are the SAME folks who have abandoned the King James Bible (the Book of our ancestors) and have pushed to replace it with garbage translations? 

The SAME folks who have insisted that we abandon the rich, deep hymns of our faith and replace them with silly 7-ELEVEN songs (song with 7 words sung over and over again at least 11 times). 

The same ones who have been systematically opposing every standard, doctrine and matter of polity - in short, those who would have us abandon the Faith of our Fathers, the "Faith once delivered unto the saints," and replace it with some eccumenical, non-sectarian, "contemporary" (or whatever they are calling it this week) watered down, politically correct religion that may I dare say doesn't have squat on the "Old Time Religion." 

For the last 20 years I have lived through that which I, as a very young man, never thought imaginable. The flag of our fathers simply being the most recent and one of the last vestiges of the faith of my fathers literally being torched before my very eyes. 

I can hardly write - I am yet to fully process it. As I do process a more articulate reply will be published. My personal response, and that of Dixie Heritage, will be ongoing. But I felt that something has to be said at this moment even as I face a publishing deadline. 

For now, know that when the SBC passes a resolution it is always NON-binding.

Baptists are NOT Presbyterians or Methodists or Episcopals. We have no denominational hierarchy as such. The local churches are autonomous and ours is a bottom-up government - not a top-down government. So ALL resolutions are NON-binding. And I am going to be contacting all of our churches in the coming months to call upon each of them to ignore this resolution!

If you are a Southern Baptist and you send me your pastor's eMail address I will personally reach out to your pastor and I will also send him a copy of my 10-chapter book A Symbol of Hate? or an Ensign of the Christian Faith? The Truth About the Confederate Battle Flag. 
 
Picture
HARRISBURG, Penn. (AP) - Finding it a symbol of racism and hate, Gov. Tom Wolf ordered a Confederate flag removed from a Flag Day exhibit in the state Capitol after the chairwoman of the black legislators' caucus took it down but event organizers put it back up. 

Wolf took action Wednesday after Capitol police had been summoned to retrieve the flag and return it to the display.

The reproduction of an 1863 Confederate battle flag was part of a historical society's collection of flags that have flown over what is now the U.S., including from territories and the colonial period.
Rep. Vanessa Lowery Brown, a Philadelphia Democrat, said she was astonished to see the flag as she walked through the Capitol's east wing on Tuesday. "I just did what I thought was right and I took the flag down," said Brown, who heads the Pennsylvania Legislative Black Caucus.

She carried it into the chambers and gave it to the House speaker.
Organizers and volunteers with the exhibit, sponsored by the Hanover Area Historical Society, realized it was missing when they assembled for a ceremony to mark the exhibit, intended to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Flag Day. They summoned Capitol police, who recovered it from the House speaker's office.

"She had no right to do it without going through proper channels, given her position," said Debra Markle, a historical society board member. "She knows what protocol is, and that was not protocol."

The exhibit organizers returned it to the display before Wolf ordered its removal.

"The Confederate flag is a symbol of racism and hatred and he doesn't think it should be displayed in a state building," said Jeff Sheridan, spokesman for the Democratic governor.

Brown said police had told her she would be arrested if she touched the flag again.

Republican Rep. Dan Moul of Adams County, who helped bring the exhibit to the Capitol, urged Wolf to reconsider his decision. "When you take something that doesn't belong to you, that's an issue, whether you like it or not," Moul said. "What's next? Somebody doesn't like one of the statues in here and they take it down on their own?"

The governor's spokesman said two other Confederate reproductions were also removed from the exhibit. The agency that currently has them plans to turn them back over to the historical society.
Markle said the 50 flags on display were exhibited in 1966 in the U.S. and Pennsylvania capitols.


COMING SOON TO A THEATRE NEAR YOU

Free State of Jones is a 2016 American war film inspired by the life of Newton Knight and his armed rebellion against the Confederacy in Jones County, Mississippi during the American Civil War.

The film was written and directed by Gary Ross, and stars Matthew McConaughey, Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Mahershala Ali, Keri Russell and Brendan Gleeson.

The film is scheduled to be released in the U.S. on June 24, 2016 by STX Entertainment.

After surviving the 1862 Battle of Corinth during the Civil War, Newton Knight, a poor farmer from Mississippi, leads a group of small farmers and local slaves in an armed rebellion against the Confederacy in Jones County. Knight subsequently marries a former enslaved woman, Rachel. He establishes a mixed-race community, unique in the post-war South.


Picture
On second thought - maybe Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill isn't such a bad idea after all:
Picture
SUPPORT DIXIE HERITAGE

Receive a banner ad in the next 52 issues of the Dixie Heritage Letter for the reduced rate of just $300 - thats just $5.76 per issue. Your banner ad will also go on the website for an entire year at no additional cost. Click the banner below to eMail for more information on how you can support Dixie Heritage and at the same time put yourself before a great audience of Southern patriots.       
Picture
About 10 years ago or so I produced a video entitled: The Destruction of Southern Churches by the United States Army. In it, I document how the Army of the United States swept across the Southern States during the War of Northern Aggression burning and looting churches, desecrating Southern cemeteries, and waging all-out war against the Christian culture of the Southern States. 

To obtain your copy of this DVD (Postage paid to anywhere in the US or Canada) simply click the button:
 

DONATE
Picture
Even today, there still remains the scars of the Union army's savage policy of "total war" in their invasion of the Christian South. Their aim was the destruction of Southern culture. 

Nothing was off limits; arson, rape, murder, thievery, grave-robbing and even physical torture. All this was carried out with the approval of the Lincoln Administration and the pleasure of the northern radicals.

The video was is a compiled record of yankee depravity from published works, church histories, diaries & etc.
Picture
"Nothing fills me with deeper sadness than to see a Southern man apologizing for the defense we made of our inheritance. Our cause was so just, so sacred, that had I known all that has come to pass, had I known what was to be inflicted upon me, all that my country was to suffer, all that our posterity was to endure, I would do it all over again.''  
--- President Jefferson Davis




 
LIKE US ON fACEBOOK

Use this link to visit the fACEBOOK page:


https://www.facebook.com/dixieheritageletter



VISIT OUR NEW WEBSITE:

Dixie Heritage has a new home on the internet.


www.dixieheritage.net 
YES, we are still giving a FREE eBook (PDF) copy of the book The Truth About the Confederate Flag  to everyone who visits the website - so tell your friends - and your enemies!  
   
 www.dixieheritage.net
Until next week,
Deo Vindice!
Chaplain Ed
 

NEW YORK TIMES OFFENDS ALL SOUTHERNERS

6/10/2016

 
Picture
The Washington National Cathedral has announced that HAMAS and ISIS allies are welcome - but the Confederate Stained-Glass Windows gotta go.
 
Reverend Gary Hall, dean of Washington National Cathedral has said that the church is going to remove the windows that depict American historical scenes from the WBTS. The scenes included a Confederate soldier playing a bugle before a line of field tents and a Confederate flag as well as Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson.
Picture
Hall says that the change in windows is being made to facilitate what he calls a conversation, "about the wrongs of the racist 'white church' in America."
 
The decision was made at the same time that an invitation was extended by Cathedral officials to host an Islamic prayer by various Muslim radical groups invited into the supposedly Christian National Cathedral. The invited Islamists included leaders of the Islamic Society of North America and the Council on American-Islamic Relations.  In 2009, both groups were identified as co-conspirators in a plan to provide funding to the HAMAS jihad group. Both groups are also suspected to have ties with ISIS.
 
The record highlighted by experts shows that CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Texas-based criminal effort to deliver $12 million to HAMAS jihad group, that CAIR was founded with $490,000 from HAMAS, and that the FBI bans top-level meetings with CAIR officials. "The FBI policy restricting a formal relationship with CAIR remains ... [but] does not preclude communication regarding investigative activity or allegations of civil rights violations," said Oct. 2, 2015 an email from FBI spokesman Christopher Allen.
 
Cathedral officials did not ask the Islamic groups for any reciprocation, not even for a polite request to the groups' to disavow their associations with HAMAS and ISIS.
 
Reverend Hall said, "The original purpose of the confederate-flag windows was to promote national unity, but the window is now an immoral homage to slavery that needs to be eradicated."
 
No timetable or system of removal has been determined to eliminate the decades-old windows, but in the meantime Cathedral officials announced the scheduling of a program called "What The White Church Must Do." With its recommendations clearly setting the "white church" apart from those serving blacks and other ethnic groups.
 
Reverend Hall is well known for his political activism. He has made national news defending his decision to turn the National Cathedral over to Muslims on the anniversary of the day the last Caliph declared war on all non-believers. It was "appropriate" to have a Muslim event in a Christian church on that day, without any comparable reciprocation, said Hall. He has also organized high profile anti-gun vigils held in the Cathedral.
 
 
 
A NEW YORK CITY TO BAN FLAG IN FUTURE PARADES
 
Officials in Saratoga Springs say they'll create guidelines for parade participants after a motorcyclist flew a Confederate flag from a staff attached to the rear of his motorcycle during the upstate city's annual Memorial Day event. A smaller U.S. flag was next to the Confederate banner.
 
During a City Council meeting Tuesday night, Saratoga Springs Mayor Joanne Yepsen assured the public that additional steps will be taken in the future to make sure that those participating in city parades are screened.
 
A few residents in the popular tourist destination expressed anger against the presence of the flag. However, most of those who commented on the initial story that ran in the Times Union on Tuesday, as well as five people who emailed, support the man who flew the flag, saying it's, "freedom of speech," and, "the man was honoring Confederate Civil War veterans."
 
Yepsen says the man may have been from Georgia, but she's unaware of how he got into the parade. City officials are investigating.
 
 
 
AMERICAN FLAGS ON CONFEDERATE GRAVES?


Some people still believe that American flags do not belong on Confederate graves. Some feel so strongly about it that they remove those flags.
 
In one recent instance, however, the flag snatcher had a change of heart.
 
An unknown person removed 163 U.S. flags from Confederate graves at Shiloh National Military Park over the Memorial Day weekend. Staff discovered the flags were missing on that Saturday and replaced them in time for official ceremonies on Memorial Day (May 30). The next day, custodial staff at the park in Tennessee found a bag with all 163 flags accompanied by a handwritten note. "It was an apology that went on to express the person's feelings that American flags should not be flying over graves of Confederate soldiers," park superintendent Dale Wilkerson told CNN on Tuesday. "But history teaches us that they do belong there," Wilkerson said.
 
"People need to understand that American flags are out there as a sign of respect, not disrespect," Wilkerson said. "It's a sign of respect for those American soldiers." A post on the park's Facebook page titled "Why There Are American Flags on Confederate Graves" laid out the events that led Congress to recognize Confederate veterans as American soldiers, according them the same benefits and honors as American veterans of other conflicts.
 
Responses to the Facebook post reflected a big difference of opinion. One commenter claiming to be a descendant of five Confederate soldiers said he took offense to the American flag being placed on Confederate graves. "Yes they are considered American soldiers but that isn't the flag they [fought] under. Placing THAT flag on their graves is nothing more than a slap in the face!!!!!!" the commenter wrote.
 
Said another, "Use some common sense. Don't put a Yankee flag on a Rebel grave. They [should have] been taken off. Put a Rebel flag on a Rebel grave."
 
Others felt equally strongly about decorating Confederate graves with the American flag.
 
A minority advocated not honoring or decorating Confederate graves at all.
 
Michael Landree, executive director of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, was quoted by CNN to have said that, "there is nothing wrong with a 50-star flag on a Confederate grave." He then is quoted to have said, "But, a Confederate flag would be more appropriate." "That's the flag they fought and died under," said Landree, who retired from the Marines in 2015 as a lieutenant colonel. "We don't disparage the use of a U.S. flag on them, but a more appropriate flag is a Confederate flag."
 
Park service regulations allow for the placement of small flags at federal cemeteries on two days: Memorial Day and Confederate Memorial Day in states that observe it. Members of the local Sons of Confederate Veterans camp held a memorial service at Shiloh battlefield on May 30 and decorated the burial sites with Confederate flags with the park's permission, Wilkerson said. "It's our honor to place those flags out there," he said.
 
 
 
 
New Jersey Democrat takes up fight to remove the Confederate flag from Citadel
 
"NEVER TRUMP" leaders in the U.S. House were unsuccessful in their recent efforts to force the removal of the Confederate flag from The Citadel's Summerall Chapel.
 
Now, a Senate Democrat is taking up their cause.
 
U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., has filed an amendment to the pending 2017 National Defense Authorization Act identical to the one that failed in the House version earlier. Both call for withholding all Reserve Officers' Training Corps funding from any military academy that flies the Confederate flag.
The Citadel in Charleston is currently the only institution that fits this category.
 
U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., who spearheaded the failed effort in the House, said he gave Booker all the relevant information weeks ago so he could pick up where House members left off.
 
South Carolina Republicans, including Gov. Nikki Haley and Senator Lindsey Graham, are actively working on the State level to take down the flag. U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., shares these sentiments and is a close ally of Booker's. But Scott said he would not go on record voting for Booker's amendment on the Confederate flag because doing so would be political suicide in South Carolina. Lindsey Graham is also taking Scott's approach to the issue for the same reasons and will simply arrange to be absent from voting on that day according to Graham's spokesman.
 
It's unlikely Booker will succeed where Clyburn has so far fallen short. But that will only be because Senators from other states will do what Nikki Haley, Lindsey Graham, and Tim Scott of South Carolina REFUSE to do - support and vote in favor of keeping the Confederate heritage for which their State has so long been known.

 
Picture
Muhammad Ali, widely regarded as the world's most famous man, died last Friday at age 74. Born Cassius Marcellus Clay, he was a titan both as a boxer and a provocateur.
 
Because we live in an era much weaker and more sensitive than it was during Ali's prime, his death is being eulogized with the sort of solemn, sanctimony-addled, weak-tea, low-T, hagiographic twaddle we've come to expect from neutered zombie bloggers on antidepressants. Just as mainstream history has Photoshopped all the warts off Nelson Mandela and MLK, Ali is now strictly framed as an inspirational figure who "spoke out against racism." Certainly they don't mean the time he condemned interracial sex before a cheering crowd?
 
The sad truth is that by shellacking history with a paintbrush soaked in modern pieties, they're suppressing how hilariously "insensitive" Ali really was.

For example, after being forced into an impromptu photo session with The Beatles in 1964, he reportedly turned to an associate and asked, "So who were those little faggots?"
 
Mere weeks later, he announced that he was changing his "slave name" of Cassius Marcellus Clay to Muhammad Ali at the behest of Elijah Muhammad, leader of the Nation of Islam. For years, Ali would be used as a completely hoodwinked and manipulated and bamboozled puppet of the Islamists.
 
Ali was not the only black with a well-deserved reputation as a tremendous athlete who had an unfortunate tendency to do dopey things when attempting to "reclaim" his lost heritage.

For example, when blacks renounce Christianity in favor of Islam, they are merely trading one group of their former slave masters for another. The original Cassius Marcellus Clay, after whom the boxer was named, was a white anti-slavery crusader and WBTS veteran. Muhammad Ali of Egypt was a warlord whose army enslaved multitudes of Sudanese.
 
From 1964 to 1980, Clay/Ali is on the record with numerous comments that would get any modern white man socially exiled to Pluto for daring to utter their equivalent:
 
"Integration is wrong....I don't believe in forcing it...." -1964 interview with the Louisville Courier-Journal
 
"My enemies are white people, not Viet Congs or Chinese or Japanese." -1967 interview regarding the draft
 
"All Jews and gentiles are devils....Blacks are no devils....Everything black people doing wrong comes from (the white people-drinking, smoking, prostitution, homosexuality, stealing, gambling-it all comes from (the white people)." -1969 interview with David Frost
 
"Every intelligent person wants his child to look like him. I'm sad because I [don't] want to blot out my race and lose my beautiful identity? Chinese love Chinese-they love their little slanted-eyed, pretty brown-skinned babies. Pakistanis love their culture. Jewish people love their culture. Lotta Catholics don't wanna marry nothing but Catholics, they want their religion to stay the same. Who wanna spot up yourself and kill your race? You a hater of your people if you don't want to stay who you are." -1971 BBC interview with the portentously named Michael Parkinson
 
"A black man should be killed if he's messing with a white woman." - 1975 interview with Playboy

"You know the entire power structure is Zionist. They control America; they control the world." -1980 interview with India Today
 
Ali relentlessly taunted other black boxers, calling them "Uncle Toms" and "gorillas." He once said that while clinching white boxers, he'd whisper in their ears that the Black Panthers knew where they lived and were going to burn their house down. He also reportedly lied in a 1975 autobiography when claiming that being refused service at a white restaurant caused him to toss his 1960 Olympics Gold Medal in the Ohio River. According to Ali's friend Bundini Brown, "Honkies sure bought into that one!"
 
Although Ali's indomitable ego fueled his ascendancy, it would later prove to be his undoing. He continued stubbornly fighting long after he'd lost his magic, and his 1980 battering at the hands of Larry Holmes was so lopsided, Holmes-a lifelong Ali fan-reportedly cried after the fight out of guilt.

In 1984 Ali was diagnosed with what is now called Parkinson's disease. It was a grim prolonged public spectacle to view the once indomitably brash heavyweight champion reduced to a jittering mess.
 
Since the 1960s are still remembered as the time when everything changed for the better rather than started falling apart, the reigning modern historians have recast Ali as a man of peace and healing and love and one-worldsmanship rather than the fearless master of physical and psychological cruelty that he was.
 
My favorite two Ali quotes, which will never be topped, touch upon one of the most unspeakable topics in this modern "conversation" about race which we're all supposed to be having but are simultaneously forbidden from even beginning to have. The topic is whether blacks, for all the oppression and brutality they allegedly endure in America, have it worse in Africa.
 
At the 1960 Rome Olympics, Ali told a reporter:
 
"To me, the U.S.A. is still the best country in the world, counting yours. It may be hard to eat sometimes, but anyhow I ain't fighting alligators and living in a mud hut."
 
After Ali spent months training in Zaire to fight George Foreman, a reporter asked him his impressions of Africa. Ali's response proves that although his IQ was twice tested at 78, he was a genius at making pithy rejoinders:
 
"Thank God my granddaddy got on that boat."

Picture
This  is  Canada 's Top Ten List of  America 's Stupidity!!!!!!!!!!!!

#  10 Only  in  America ... Could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a  $35,000.00 per plate Obama campaign fund-raising  event.

#  09 Only  in  America ... Could people claim that the government still discriminates  against black Americans when they have a black President, a black  Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black  while only 14% of the population is black, 40+% of all federal entitlements  goes to black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate  that go to Hispanics!

#  08 Only  in  America ... Could they have had the two people most responsible for our  tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and  Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee),  BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher  taxes.

#  07 Only  in  America ... Can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and  have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed  by the backlash.

#  06 Only  in  America ... Would they make people who want to legally become American  citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of  thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting  anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become  American citizens. (probably should be number one)

#  05 Only  in  America ... Could the people who believe in balancing the budget and  sticking by the country's Constitution be called EXTREMISTS.

#  04 Only  in  America ... Could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check  or buy alcohol, but not to vote.

#  03 Only  in  America ... Could people  demand  the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public  because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a  major U.S. Oil company (Marathon  Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes  (Nike).

#  02 Only  in  America ... Could you collect more tax dollars from the people than any  nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it  has per year - for total spending of $7 Million PER  MINUTE, and  complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.

#  01 Only  in  America .... Could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be  accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any  income taxes at all.                        


SUPPORT DIXIE HERITAGE

Receive a banner ad in the next 10 issues of the Dixie Heritage Letter for the reduced rate of just $80 - thats just $8 per issue. Your banner ad will also go on the website at no additional cost. Click the banner below to eMail for more information on how you can support Dixie Heritage and at the same time put yourself before a great audience of Southern patriots.       
Picture
OBAMA APPOINTS RACIST ANTI-AMERICAN JUDGE

This past week Donald Trump has been accused of being a racist because he dared to point out that a member of the Federal Judiciary is also a member of a violent anti-American group.


 
Before getting into the racially-challenged Judge Curiel, here is a brief history of La Raza for those who are, yet, unfamiliar with the organization. La Raza is a virulent racist anti-white organization that wants to have US land ceded to Mexico, will affect riots and all manner of violence to do so and have gotten a pass from the current administration. Instead, Obama appointed former Head of La Raza Cecilia Munoz to 2 positions in his White House...that of Director of Intergovernmental Affairs and the position she currently maintains as the Director of the White House Council. Munoz has been with the ObamaGov since it began in January 2009. She wields a great deal of power. And is, arguably, one of the strongest racists in his administration.
 
The Southwest Council of La Raza (SWCLR) was founded in 1968 and with funding from-amongst others-the leftist Ford Foundation, it quickly became the National Council of La Raza (NCLR).  La Raza means "The Race" and it began as a Mexican-specific organization.  The group's motto is "Everything for The Race.  Outside The Race...Nothing!"  La Raza is a hard-line Marxist organization and it openly expresses hatred for white people.  Even Marxist Cesar Chavez talked against the group when he commented "I hear more and more Mexicans talking about la raza-to build up their pride. Some people don't look at it as racism, but when you say 'La Raza,' you are saying an anti-gringo thing, and it won't stop there. Today it's anti-gringo, tomorrow it will be anti-Negro.We had a stupid guy who just wanted to play politics with the union, and he began to whip up La Raza against the white volunteers, and even had some of the farm workers and the pickets and the organizers hung up on La Raza. So I took him on. These things have to be met head on. On discrimination, I don't even give the members the privilege of a vote, and I'm not ashamed of it. No, the whole business of discrimination can't exist here. So often, these days, the leaders are afraid, and even though they feel strongly against racism, they will not speak out against it. If the leadership is united, then it can say, 'All right, if you're going to do things that way, then you'll have to get rid of us.' You have to speak out immediately, the first time."
 
Judge Curiel is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association. They seem to follow the same tenets as the national group, including but, not limited to support for illegal immigrants (specifically Mexican, Latino, Hispanic) entering the USA.
 
Continuing to flout US law, Judge Curiel, also, gave US school scholarships to Mexican illegal aliens.

An Obama-appointed judge who won't obey laws he doesn't like.  Hmmm.  Sound familiar? 

Gotnews.com has searched naturalization records but could find none showing that Curiel's parents who migrated from Mexico were ever US citizens.
 
Yes, folks.  It appears Mr. Trump is correct.  And who is the real racist?  To me...it certainly doesn't appear to be Trump.
 
We must all remain vigilant, now, and watch what people do, listen to what they say and then investigate both. 

Oh, and did I tell you that La-Raza supports the secession of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and Southern California into an independent nation where everyone will have a common race (latino), a common language (spanish), a common religion (Catholicism) and a common geography (in what was formerly the Southernmost US States)? And yet the same liberals who would give LaRaza a pass are insistent that our ancestors were radical traitors for wanting to do the SAME thing when 13 Southern States, all sharing a common language and culture, seceeded and attempted to form an independent nation called the Confederate States of America. 
 
"This is why I speak to them in parables: "Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand"-.Matthew 13:13    


 

Have you ever wondered what it was like to serve in the Confederate States Army?


Last week we discussed Raphael Semmes, an officer in the Confederate Navy and his excellent book. This week we are offering the book: Detailed Minutiae of Soldier Life in the Army of Northern Virginia, 1861-1865 by Carlton McCarthy. 

This is an excellent book that tells what it was like to serve in the CSA Army.  

Everyone who gives a gift of $5 or more this week will receive a copy of Detailed Minutiae of Soldier Life in the Army of Northern Virginia, 1861-1865 by Carlton McCarthy.

To obtain your copy of Detailed Minutiae of Soldier Life in the Army of Northern Virginia, 1861-1865 by Carlton McCarthy click here:

Donate $5
Picture
TED CRUZ DAD REALLY WAS A CIA OPERATIVE? SO WAS GRANDAD?

Some of you may remember back a few weeks, in response to the news story that a previously unidentified man in a photo with the infamous Lee Harvy Oswald may have been Raphael Cruz, father of Ted Cruz, that I postulated that Ted's father being a CIA operative would certainly explain a lot.

Well, it may just be, as Uncle Reamus would say, "its factual."
 
CIA: Requests for Documents on Ted Cruz's Father

The Obama administration has been playing a cat-and-mouse game, in response to media generated freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the Central Intelligence Agency for "copies of all records generated between January 1, 1947 and May 5, 2016, concerning the Central Intelligence Agency's employment of or contacts with Rafael Bienvenidos Cruz, Sr., the Cuban-born grandfather of Texas Senator Ted Cruz."

Also requested were all similar records generated between January 1, 1956 and May 5, 2016, concerning the CIA's relationships with Rafael Bienvenidos Cruz y Diaz, Jr., the Cuban-born father of Ted Cruz.

The agency has not only rejected numerous requests for expedited processing of the request for not demonstrating "a compelling need" but has used Privacy Act requirements to stymie several of the FOIA request on Ted Cruz's father's past association with the CIA.

The CIA has responded that requests on living [emphasis in original] third parties to provide a signed affidavit or declaration from the third parties waiving all or some of their privacy rights. In the case of Ted Cruz's father, who is still alive, it is highly doubtful that he will waive any of his privacy rights in order that any CIA records of his association with the agency in Texas, Louisiana, Florida, Cuba, or Canada be released to the public.

As for Ted Cruz's grandfather, an employee of the RCA Corporation in Cuba, a followup request for documents remains possible as long as a media outlet can supply the CIA with his date and place of birth and date and place of death, with the death affirmed by a death certificate or obituary notice in hard copy (good luck with that).

The CIA's reason for the requirement for a death certificate or obituary notice is that they "may be unable to distinguish between individuals with the same or similar names" in order to "ensure there are no privacy considerations." The names of Ted Cruz's father and grandfather are identical.

So if there were not records documenting that both Ted's father and grandfather were in fact CIA operatives why doesn't the agency simply refuse the requests on the grounds that there are no such documents?

Could this be the real reason Ted dropped out of the race so suddenly?





NEW YORK TIMES OFFENDS ALL SOUTHERNERS

The New York Times made a curious editorial decision earlier this week regarding the picture they picked to go with their article about Donald Trump's speech before the Rolling Thunder motorcyclists in Washington D.C.

In their piece, the Times described how Trump addressed an "incongruous constituency" at this event. The Rolling Thunder Rally is meant to 'honor educate, facilitate, and never forget by means of a demonstration for service members that were abandoned after the Vietnam War.'

However, in what might have been the most peculiar part of the article, though, the Times decided that their top featured image from the event would be one with a Trump-supporting biker with the Confederate Flag patched on the back of his jacket.

The Times decided to go with the picture of the flag when there were many images from the rally for them to choose from. In fact, we reviewed coverage from several different mainstream media outlets and we didn't find anyone else featuring an image with the Confederate Flag.  Trump's event received a great deal of media coverage as per usual, and there were plenty of pictures available where the controversial image is not seen.

The fact is that the New York Times believes the Confederate Flag to be evil. That is why they chose it in their not so veiled effort to paint Donald Trump as evil. Neither Trump, nor the flag of our ancestors is evil. But maybe, I'm starting to think, that the New York Times is!   

 
LIKE US ON fACEBOOK

Use this link to visit the fACEBOOK page:

https://www.facebook.com/dixieheritageletter



VISIT OUR NEW WEBSITE:

Dixie Heritage has a new home on the internet.


www.dixieheritage.net 

YES, we are still giving a FREE eBook (PDF) copy of the book The Truth About the Confederate Flag  to everyone who visits the website - so tell your friends - and your enemies!  
   
 www.dixieheritage.net
Until next week,
Deo Vindice!
Chaplain Ed

FREE BIBLE AND CONFEDERATE FLAG WITH ANY PURCHASE IN THIS TENNESSEE STORE

6/3/2016

 
Picture
Memorial Day, officially a day to honor Americans who have died in war, has more broadly come to symbolize the unofficial start of summer. Many Americans will take a trip to the beach, barbeque or just enjoy a day off from work.
 
Now there is an effort to create a new tradition - burning the Confederate flag.
 
The movement is being led by John Sims, an "artist" in Sarasota, Florida. Sims started the initiative last year when he organized confederate flag burnings in 13 cities across the South.
 
The events were relatively small but generated fierce opposition from groups like the Sons of Confederate Veterans and significant media attention.
 
This year, Sims upped the ante. One factor that reduced participation last year, he says, was that many people who were interested did not want to go out and purchase a Confederate flag. This year he's created a downloadable "Burn and Bury" kit that allows people to print out their own Confederate flag at home, suitable for burning.
 
Sims also broadcast this year's activities live online.
 
ThinkProgress talked with Sims about his plans for the future who said he plans to make burning the flag an annual event and that he will expand the effort each year.
 
 
 
WBTS BATTLEFIELD IS NOW AN ACTIVE CRIME SCENE
 
The National Park Service is calling part of a WBTS battlefield "an active crime scene" following a series of excavations. Authorities are investigating looting at the Petersburg National Battlefield, just south of Richmond, Virginia. The battlefield describes itself as the site of the war's longest siege, lasting nine months between 1864-1865, and claiming 70,000 casualties.
 
"Earlier this week, one of the park employees was out doing landscape work and noticed some things were out of place," NPS spokesman Chris Bryce said. The looting happened in the eastern part of the park, the National Park Service said, citing a large number of excavated pits. Marked graves were not disturbed.
 
Park officials have not described what type of items or relics were stolen in the theft. Relics, like uniform buttons, rifle parts and other metallic battlefield items regularly show up on internet auction sites. The Park Service says looting a National Battlefield is a federal crime, carrying up to a $20,000 fine and two years in prison for a conviction.

 
 
WISCONSIN SCHOOL EXPELS STUDENT

A student at Nicolet High School in Milwaukee was disciplined on Wednesday for bringing a confederate flag to English class.
 
Dr. Robert Kobylski, Superintendent for the Nicolet School District, issued the following statement:
 
"On Wednesday a student made a derogatory and offensive demonstration during an English class. This action disrupted the class and is in violation of district policy. We conducted an investigation that resulted in disciplinary action. Fostering an educational community based on tolerance and respect is of the utmost importance to the administration, faculty and staff at Nicolet.
Appropriate personnel are available to assist students who wish to talk about the incident."

 
 
 
SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR ATTACKS HERITAGE AND TRUMP

Speaking to reporters Thursday in her office, Governor Nikki Haley said she is working toward approving the removal of a Confederate flag from a Citadel chapel.
 
Haley said she has told Citadel cadets that the flag was a "flying, living, breathing, representative symbol.... You can't have that representation there and have children drive by and think that they don't belong...start to go back in history for SC, you'd be replacing every street sign, every building...Our goal is to make sure every child felt welcome."
 
Haley was speaking to reporters ahead of the first anniversary of the June 17, 2015 shootings of nine churchgoers in Charleston.
 
"The state was forever changed. I see good and bad that came out of June 17," Haley said. "The bad obviously is that we lost nine people and that three other people have to live with that memory of what happened in that room that night. The good side of it was, I've never been more proud of the people in South Carolina. It should restore everyone's faith and goodness in people."
 
Haley said South Carolinians learned something about themselves in the aftermath of the shooting "that they didn't know" - something she credits with bringing down the Confederate flag.
 
She then began to blame the whole thing on Donald Trump, even though he had nothing to do with any of it and had barely begun his candidacy at the time. She said that, "Hearing that rhetoric from Trump was the reason I was vocal about it." Haley went on to say that she endorsed U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida "to show that that's not all of who we are."
Picture
The following is submitted by Ben Trittipoe, President of the Stuart-Mosby Historical Society:

As we begin another year in The Stuart-Mosby Historical Society, we do so with considerable trepidation.

Even the most oblivious amongst us cannot be unaware of the "tenor of the times." Indeed, many believe that we are not all that different from those whom we study-the people who had to deal with the state of the nation in 1860. At the age of 75, I can testify that the world in which I grew up-and frankly spent most of my adult life- had absolutely no relationship to the present state of our world in general and our country in particular. Of course, those of us interested in the badly mis-named "civil war" cannot be unmindful of the assault being made on all things Southern-history, heritage, symbols, monuments &c.-neither can we fail to see that this assault presages more and worse to come. Many in response have advised the three "cs" of modern culture: compromise, conciliation and calm-only to find that these "strategies," especially the last which is also known as "silence," tend to lead only to louder and more strident voices raised against us together with actions which are absolutely foreign to civilized discourse [see the vandalism of Southern monuments]. Not a day goes by that some building, institution or road is either renamed or threatened with being so. At present a school bearing General Stuart's

honorable name is under attack in order to force its removal. Interestingly, in all of this, polls and petitions show that the vast majority of those interested do not favor this institutional vandalism, but it never seems to matter.

One disgruntled ignoramus with an agenda trumps [no pun intended!] literally thousands of well informed and objective Americans!

It seems strange that this assault on Southern heritage and history should have started during the Susquecentennial, a time when surely this history should have been brought forward for further research leading in turn to a better understanding of the causes and consequences of the war. Instead, the Marxist strategy of

"political correctness" demands that we remain silent while history is rewritten. But far worse than our enemies are our friends who believe that it really doesn't matter! They do not understand the consequences of what is happening and so they fail to do their utmost to resist.

Frankly, we believe that
every member of The Stuart-Mosby Historical Society should go out and immediately purchase a copy of Orwell's 1984! The man was 32 years off in his timing, but spot-on correct in his predictions. We naturally assume that members of the Society are interested in history. As that is the case, then certainly this quiet but savage war cannot be ignored! Below is exactly what Orwell had to say about this struggle by those who would use "history" to enslave us all:


He who controls the past, controls the future;

He who controls the present-controls the past!

So that his readers understood the nature of the world he was creating-or more precisely, predicting-Orwell defined the inevitable result of this "control" thusly:

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."

Decent people cannot permit this assault to continue without at least trying to prevent.
 
The Society has scored a major victory on our first front with the restoration of the statue honoring Major General J.E.B. Stuart on Monument Avenue in Richmond. Andrew Baxter, his partner Steve Roy and their company, Bronze et al, Ltd., completed the work in early May and the Society held a ceremony to thank the Donors on May 14 (see details in a separate report in this issue of the Southern Cavalry Review). With a maintenance program to be launched soon, the statue will be a gleaming tribute to Gen. Stuart for many years to come.


SOMETIMES WE NEED TO KNOW WHO TO CALL

Be sure to click the banner and check out  Scott's website. The sad reality is that the defense of our heritage is going to require expert legal representation. Scott is a Compatriot who is not ashamed to fight for the cause in the courtroom. His firm also offers business, contract, real-estate, and other forms of legal representation.  
Picture
SLAVERY WAS NEVER ABOLISHED

Mauritania, the West African country long thought to be home to the world's highest percentage of enslaved people, no longer holds that lamentable title, according to a report released late Monday.

The Walk Free Foundation's slavery index says the percentage of people living in modern slavery in Mauritania dropped from 4% in 2014 to about 1% this year.

The country, which CNN featured in the 2012 documentary "Slavery's last stronghold," now has the world's seventh-highest incidence of slavery.

North Korea ranks worst on the index. Nearly one in five people there are thought to be enslaved.

"Slavery is not a thing of the past, and we must stop thinking that it is," the Walk Free Foundation said in a statement issued to CNN. "The very nature of modern slavery means it is clandestine and hidden from view, but that doesn't mean it isn't everywhere. Every country in the world is affected."


A NOTE FROM H.K.

Any knowledgeable Southern Black can tell you that the Honorable Thomas (Stonewall ) Jackson, and his wife were more than just a friend to the African people. They cared for his spiritual welfare, and opened their home and Church and gave them an introduction to Jesus Christ like no other. And to this day that influence is still incorporated in the beings of their African ancestors.

However, it is important for you to understand that the NAACP set upon the attack of the Christian Cross of St. Andrew to raise funds for their depleting coffers, and for the new occupation of our homeland by the sons and daughters of the thieves and murders who came here under orders of Lincoln to rob, steal, rape, and murder innocent old men, men and children. Nothing else. There is no other reason that we find ourselves as a Black race once again being used as the weapon of choice against our White Southern family.

It makes no difference that the whole world was complicit in the economic institution of slavery, or that the Christian charity of the Southern White people to the African race has no parallel worldwide. Or that General Jackson and General Lee's Virginia was working so hard up until the South was illegally invaded to free the African people in honor. The bottom line is that those White folks who own the NAACP have an agenda of Southern social and cultural genocide that will make it comfortable for them to attain what they left behind. And could care less about the African people that they have duped as the Honorable General Patrick Ronayne Cleburne so well predicted.

The NAACP and the Southern Poverty Law Center are the foremost hate organizations in America today and try to disguise this fact as if they are friends to the African people. Having me to write to them is like feeding food to a dead man. I can only try to educate the masses to their treachery. God bless you!                      


SUPPORT DIXIE HERITAGE

Receive a banner ad in the next 52 issues of the Dixie Heritage Letter for the reduced rate of just $300 - thats just $5.76 per issue. Your banner ad will also go on the website for an entire year at no additional cost. Click the banner below to eMail for more information on how you can support Dixie Heritage and at the same time put yourself before a great audience of Southern patriots.       

Picture
hen Yankees Were Rebels

Slave-holding and slave-trading rebels of Massachusetts resisted the might of British troops sent to disperse them, and the Southern colonies voluntarily assisted New England in its war to end British rule. Some 86 years later Southern rebels at Manassas resisted the might of New England troops sent to disperse them but had no assistance in its war to end New England rule:

 "At five o'clock on Wednesday morning, a man on horseback, without cape or coat, galloped into Lexington, shouting that the British were coming up the road. Some called him to stop; but he rushed on in that mad way toward Concord. Then it was that the blood boiled in our veins. We remembered the insults and threats which had been heaped upon us so long, and swore that they should be avenged that day. Some ran through the streets, waving their hats over their heads, and hurrahing for their rights. The women ran from house to house, gathering muskets for the militia, and carrying ammunition in their aprons. No one was idle, and no one was afraid to face all the British troops - yes, and fight them too, if fighting was to be done. At last the drum beat to arms. We seized our muskets and rushed to the green. Captain Parker drew us up, seventy strong, in double rank; telling us to fight bravely in the cause for freedom. Then were heard their drums beating, and saw the bayonets peeping out from the dust, and glittering in the sun. But what could seventy men do against a thousand? Their leader galloped up like a madman; cursing, shouting, and ordering us to disperse. All at once they poured a volley at us . . . they fired again; then the dreadful scene began. The enemy marched to the storehouses, broke them open, and began the work of destruction. The flour was emptied into the river; the ball, which we had gathered with so much care, stolen or sunk in wells, and our two cannon battered and abused till they were unfit for use. Next day they began to break up the bridges; and this was more than we could bear. And soon the hills and lanes were swarming with the boys from Reading and Roxbury, who had heard of their friends being shot . . . we rushed headlong on the murderers, and drove them and their commander out of the town. O! It was glorious to be in that chase - glorious! Remember boys, how often we were insulted by [General] Gage, and called "rebels," or "Yankees" by his men! Yes, and cowards, too - cowards! The blood boils at the word! And then our bleeding men behind us! - it was glory, I say lads, to chase the rascals like deer up the road, and make them feel that "rebels" could fight as well as they!"

Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.com   The Great American Political Divide
(Camp-Fires of the Revolution, Henry Clay Watson, Lindsay & Blakiston, 1854, pp. 23-27)
 
 

Have you ever wondered what it was like to serve in the Confederate States Navy?


Raphael Semmes (September 27, 1809 - August 30, 1877) was an officer in the Confederate Navy during the WBTS. Prior to this, he had been a serving officer in the United States Navy from 1826 through 1860.

During the WBTS, Semmes was Captain of the commerce raider CSS Alabama, which took 65 prizes. Late in the war, he was promoted to Rear Admiral and also served briefly as a Brigadier General in the Confederate Army. Semmes is the only North American to have held both ranks simultaneously.

Memoirs of Service Afloat, During the War Between the States by Raphael Semmes is an excellent book that tells what it was like to serve in the CSA Navy.

Everyone who gives a gift of $5 or more this week will receive a copy of Memoirs of Service Afloat, During the War Between the States by Raphael Semmes.

To obtain your copy of Memoirs of Service Afloat, During the War Between the States by Raphael Semmes click here:

DONATE $5
Picture
nti-PC: Free Bible and Confederate Flag with every purchase at THIS store 
In the Age of Obama political correctness has been placed on hyperdrive, but a growing mass of citizenry is rejecting it out of hand and going to great lengths in which to do so.
 
This rejection is epitomized by a gun shop in Oakland, Tenn., which is handing out Bibles and your choice of an American or Confederate flag with every purchase.
 
As reported by the Washington Free Beacon, Big Bang Guns is making the offer to every customer who walks in the door. Located just outside of Memphis, the small gun shop (which offers its products online too, by the way) says its promotion is scheduled to run through July 14.
 
When the shop was asked why the promotion, manager Tony Tavares said, "Why not?"
 
"It's pretty patriotic to offer both and a Bible as well," he told the WFB. "It's freedom of speech with some religion to go along with it."
 
Cue the PC Left's outrage machine.
 
So far, customers have really taken to the offer and have responded very positively.
 
John McFarland, the shop owner, said, "The customers like it. We sell everything from $200 guns all the way up to $20,000 Barretts. It's picked up really well."
 
The shop owner said he's sick of seeing American traditions and values attacked so he created the promotion as a way to support those who believe as he does.
 
"I'm at a point in my life where I'm tired of everybody making me feel bad for what my moral beliefs are," he told the Free Beacon. "I believe there's history behind the rebel flag, I believe there's history behind the American flag, I believe in the right to bear arms, and I believe in freedom of religion."
"I just wanted to let everybody know we believe in that and we support everybody who believes in that," he added.
 
"We're just trying to promote American freedoms," McFarland said. "I'm pretty outspoken politically and I believe everybody has their rights. I believe if you're an atheist you have that right. I believe if you believe in God you have that right. And I believe if you believe in the Confederate flag, you believe in the history behind it, you have the right to have it. And that's where we stand and I'll stand behind that."
"To me, that's more important than any amount of business."
 
And to tens of millions of other Americans as well.
 
Picture
LIKE US ON fACEBOOK

Use this link to visit the fACEBOOK page:

https://www.facebook.com/dixieheritageletter



VISIT OUR NEW WEBSITE:

Dixie Heritage has a new home on the internet.


www.dixieheritage.net 
YES, we are still giving a FREE eBook (PDF) copy of the book The Truth About the Confederate Flag  to everyone who visits the website - so tell your friends - and your enemies!  
   
 www.dixieheritage.net
Until next week,
Deo Vindice!
Chaplain Ed

    Author

    Dr. Ed DeVries is an author, pastor, public speaker, radio host, re-enactor, and the Director of Dixie Heritage.

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

The following is a PAID ADVERTISEMENT:
Picture

The following is a PAID ADVERTISEMENT:
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.