​In this week's TBR Radio Presents: The Dixie Heritage Hour, Dr. Ed shares the video of the lecture that he gave on the Antietam battlefield during a nationally-advertised event sponsored jointly by The Barnes Review and The Citizen's Informer. 

Dr. DeVries, using the Hebrew and Greek words translated as "nation" in the Old and New Testaments, explains the difference between a "nation" and a "state." While most people use these terms interchangeably,  they are in fact, two totally different and distinct things. 

When you understand the difference between a "nation" and a "state" you will understand why the emerging American nation shook off the British government in 1776 and why the emerging Southern nation seceeded from the "Union" in 1861. 

Robert E. Lee, if he were to be defined in modern terms, would be declared to be a "nationalist." 

"Nationalism" is HATED by the governments of the world because history teaches that governments or "states" come and go but "nations" endure. Therefore, if the "State" wants to survive, it must destroy its underlying "nation."

Dr. DeVries' lecture puts the modern day political struggle into very clear perspective. 

The lecture was about 30 minutes. So after the lecture Dr. Ed shares videos that the parents of Leavenworth 10 inmate John Hatley's parents had shot with their iPhones and texted to Dr. Ed for broadcast on a TBR Radio show. 

The show concludes with a 12 minute conversation with Dr. Matthew Johnson. Dr. Matt and Dr. Ed discuss the academic paper, "The State is the Natural Enemy of the ETHNOS," by Dr. Johnson. The paper and its discussion are a very appropriate accompaniment to Dr. Ed's lecture.

Dr. Ed talks to Keri Ross, author of the newly published book Fifty and Failing Fabulously and fiancé to 1st Sergeant John E. Hatley of the Leavenworth 10 fame. 

After a brief discussion of the book, Dr. Ed asks Keri about her boyfriend and she both tells his story and, more importantly, how we can advocate for an American hero falsely accused and imprisoned on American soil. 

Because when you enlist to serve your country, the real danger is not from a foreign adversary, but from ambitious officers conniving for stars on their collars. 

Do you remember the news reports of the supposed “canal killings” back in 2009. The United States Army effectively created a depiction of 1SG Hatley as a cold-blooded killer who executed four Iraqis. Because of it, he has been in prison for ten long years. But the Army has also told this supposed "cold-blooded killer" that he can go home tomorrow if he will just confess to the crime. 

But Hatley won’t admit guilt because he is innocent!

Keri tells us how there were no bodies found, no names of victims or their families, and absolutely no physical or forensic evidence. A seven-man dive team searched the canal where the bodies were supposedly dumped and found nothing. No bullets or casings were found in the area, which is in itself weird because this had been the site of intensive fighting.

Criminal Investigation Division (CID) was taken to the house where the nameless insurgents allegedly killed by Hatley were reported to have lived. The people there said no one was missing or dead in their families. But again, their names were not obtained. Neighbors in the area were also questioned and they too said no one was missing or dead. The farmer who owned the land of the supposed killings said he knew of no one being killed. 

At trial there were major discrepancies of testimony with some "eye-witnesses" (also ambitious soldiers) claiming there were four victims, others claiming five. None of the "witnesses" nor CID knew what happened to the fifth man. Testimony was inconsistent and contradictory. 

The charges themselves were not filed until ten months after the event when a sergeant under Hatley's command was up on charges by Hatley for two instances of striking an NCO, and one count of threatening an officer with great bodily harm. He offered CID info on a "homicide" if they would grant him immunity. Immunity was not granted, but his attorney had already given CID the file. All men in the patrol were interrogated intensely with some being threatened with life in prison. All of them but John Hatley took plea deals rather than risk “life in prison.” The threats were probably similar to what Lieutenant General Michael Flynn was subjected to by the FBI in the whole Russian collusion caper.

John E. Hatley was convicted by the United States Army solely on the basis of coerced testimony. One witness said when he shot a man in the back of the head, he fell back against his leg. That’s highly unlikely if not impossible, because when people are shot, their body normally goes in the direction of the bullet.

Again, there were no bodies, no names, no physical or forensic evidence—only the testimony of men with something to gain. If they testified as they were told by Army lawyers, they would receive a much better deal.

Oh and hey… Army brass had something to gain also. By convicting someone (anyone) for murdering innocent civilians, they could help to make amends for other Army wartime atrocities. Anyone remember Abu Ghraib military prison where people were being subjected to torture and humiliation for the entertainment of sadistic officers?

This is just another case of someone railroaded right into a military penitentiary, not based on any evidence, but based on the ambition of politically correct officers and their Congressional overseers. 

We found out a long time ago, the military doesn’t need evidence to convict someone. In the civilian world a district attorney can indict a ham sandwich. Because of the closed military structure, that same “ham sandwich” is not only indicted but convicted as well. It’s heinously disgraceful how our military can manipulate their judicial system to protect the organization itself, and senior military officers from any scrutiny or accountability.

Such is the John Hatley story, the object of much of this week's broadcast.

​Dr. Ed calls Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson. Dr. Johnson was the guest for TBR Radio's highest rated, most listened to show of 2018. 

Dr. Johnson is a Russian Orthodox Priest, college professor, and one of the United States' foremost experts on Russia. He tells Dr. Ed about his new book, The Soviet Experiment, recently published by TBR Press. They also discuss the recent summit between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un (BIG NEWS that is NOT being reported by any mainstream news sources). 

Additional discussion focuses on Joe Biden's less than honest dealings in the Ukraine andhow that news might effect the 2020 Democrat Primary. 

The conversation ends with a discussion of "Russian collusion." But rather than repeat all the hubabaloo from the mainstream media, Dr. Johnson tells us what we should be talking about regarding Russia and collusion. For example, back in the 90's the United States did not just "meddle" or "interfere" or attempt to "influence" the Russian election of Boris Yeltsin, the United States outright rigged the Russian election for Yeltsin (who had a 5% approval rating among the Russian people) and even bragged about it in Time Magazine. 

The show begins with a musical performance by the Russian National Children's Choir and ends with a rare performance of the old Soviet national anthem in English.

Dr. Ed interviews London socialite Lady Michelle Renouf.  

Born in Australia, at 22, Michele Mainwaring was a beauty queen with several titles. 

In 1970 she married Daniel Ivan-Zadeh, a descendant of Russian nobility whose family had fled from the collapsing Russian Empire during the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, changing their surname on arrival in Persia. Upon marrying Daniel she was given the title Countess of Griaznoff. 

In 1990 the then 44-year-old Countess married 72-year-old Sir Frank Renouf and was given the title of "Lady Michelle" by Queen Elizabeth. Sir Frank was an international financier who, among other things, oversaw the reinstallation of Germany into the Rothschild banking system. Through him, lady Michelle gained the inside knowledge of the banking systems and knows first hand the damage they have wrought throughout the world. 

Sir Frank and Lady Michelle resided in the Eaton Square home of the former Prime Minister to England, Sir Neville Chamberlain, who had preceded Winston Churchill. 

Sir Frank died in 1998 and Lady Michelle dated world-famous actor Omar Sharif, best known for performance in the 1962 film Lawrence of Arabia. 

Famous in Britain, Germany and Australia, Lady Michelle has worked for decades as a model in print ads and commercials. She is often cast as a well-to-do woman of a certain age in British TV.

Lady Michelle travels Europe and the globe as an advocate for a number of political causes including BREXIT. 

She has also moved to the other side of the camera, launching an independent film company, producing documentary films. 

In this week's conversation, Lady Michelle talks about the psychology of advertising and specifically about how that psychology is manipulated in political campaigns, the importance of preserving our heritage, why she is no longer afraid to discuss "race," specific questions that have resulted in historians and academics being jailed throughout Europe, how the attorneys are being punished and jailed if they dare to provide their clients in these trials with a real and actual defense, why "the truth" is no longer accepted as a proper defense in European courts, Nigel Farage and her hopes for Brexit, the specific reasons why the late Colonel Muammar Quadaffi was murdered, exactly what the New World Order is and how it works, more specifics on the evils of the banking system, her thoughts on Donald Trump and Queen Elizabeth, her friendship with the late Joseph Sobran, and a number of other topics.